Dark logo

AI Winter is Coming?

Published August 8, 2021
Doug Rose
Author | Agility | Artificial Intelligence | Data Ethics

In an interesting post on HackerNoon.com entitled Is Another AI Winter Coming?, Thomas Nield argues that the expectations for artificial intelligence (AI) may exceed its potential, and that if we do not "temper our expectations and stop hyping 'deep learning' capabilities . . . we may find ourselves in another AI Winter." He expects the growing skepticism over AI capabilities to "go mainstream as soon as 2020."

Although AI does seem overhyped in some circles, I doubt an AI Winter is coming any time in the near future, if ever. I base this doubt on the following points:

  • AI research is currently driving development of numerous commercially viable technologies, such as self-driving cars, targeted product recommendations, and fraud detection and prevention. As long as innovation of commercial applications continues, money will continue to flow into AI research and development, regardless of whether true AI is ever achieved.
  • The growth of data in terms of volume, variety, and velocity will continue to drive innovation of machine learning (ML) and AI as new uses for data are discovered.
  • Innovations in processors and computer systems will increase processing power, complexity, and speed, enabling further developments in the AI field.
  • Ongoing development of algorithms and how they are used will continue to deliver innovations that may not live up to the hype of true AI but are likely to be impressive enough to encourage continued investment in the field.

What Is AI Winter?

AI winter is a period of time during which interest in and funding for AI research slumps. The two major AI winters occurred in 1974–1980 and 1987–1993 due to disappointing results that led to decreased funding for research.

Each of these periods was preceded by an AI Spring — a period of significant activity and progress in the field. The first spring occurred in 1956—1974, a period that included the invention of the perceptron by Frank Rosenblatt in 1958, along with several computers that were able to solve algebra word problems, prove theorems in geometry, and speak English. The second AI spring occurred in 1980–1987, a period which coincided with the development of the first expert systems based on the physical symbol system, developed by Allen Newell and Herbert A. Simon.

We are currently experiencing an AI spring, which began in 1993, primarily due to the development of the intelligent agent — an autonomous entity that perceives its environment and acts accordingly; for example, a self-driving car. The current spring gained momentum in the early 2000s with advances in machine learning and statistical AI along with increased availability of big data and significant increases in processing power.

What Is AI Anyway?

Whether AI is overhyped depends on how you define "artificial intelligence." If you define it as a machine's ability to perform tasks traditionally thought to require human intelligence, then we have already achieved AI. We now have self-driving cars, automated investment advisors, and systems that are more accurate than doctors at diagnosing cancer and other diseases in patients.

However, if you define AI as a machine or computer system that possesses self-consciousness and self-determination, then AI may be unattainable. We may never see robots that think like humans. In that sense, we may be in a perpetual AI winter characterized by periods of booms and busts in research funding.

The Journey Is More Important Than the Destination

Nearly every ground-breaking technology experiences ebbs and flows. A few meet or even exceed expectations, and some never do. I think AI is somewhat different. I like to compare it to space exploration, in which, it seems to me, the journey is more important than the destination.

Maybe AI is a pipe dream — an unattainable goal. But maybe that's unimportant. Maybe this unattainable goal that we foolishly believe is attainable is the inspiration that motivates us to explore. As such, that is good enough, because in our drive to achieve the unattainable, we improve the human condition through increased knowledge and skills, amazing new technologies, and innovative products.

I think we have learned that lesson over the years — over the course of the several AI springs and winters — and I believe that having learned this lesson will make a future AI winter much less likely.

Related Posts
March 19, 2018
Using an Expert System Instead of Machine Learning

In some cases an expert system may make more sense than machine learning. You can use AI to automate decision-making in a specific field without training on huge amounts of data.

Read More
February 19, 2018
Examples of Machine Learning

Examples of machine learning applications that are designed to solve complex business challenges.

Read More
January 15, 2018
Solve General Problems with Artificial Intelligence

The General Problem Solver In a previous post entitled "Playing the Imitation Game," I discussed Alan Turing's vision, published in 1936, of a single, universal machine that could be programmed to solve any particular problem. In 1959, Allen Newell and Herbert A. Simon took a different approach. Their goal was to develop a computer program […]

Read More
1 2 3 10
9450 SW Gemini Drive #32865
Beaverton, Oregon, 97008-7105
Dark logo
© 2022 Doug Enterprises, LLC All Rights Reserved
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram